Introduction
The Delhi High Court on August 8, 2025, rejected a plea by Kumar Mangat Pathak, producer of Drishyam 2, seeking to dismiss an FIR filed over alleged fraud in the film’s overseas distribution rights. Justice Neena Krishna Bansal emphasized the ongoing nature of the investigation and Pathak’s cooperation as reasons to allow proceedings to continue.
Background of the Allegations
The FIR, lodged by the Economic Offences Wing of Delhi Police, involves allegations that a businessman was defrauded of ₹4.3 crore in a deal offering exclusive Chinese-language distribution rights for Drishyam 2 in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Charges include conspiracy, document forgery, and misrepresentation.
Disputed Transactions via Middleman
The complainant alleges that Bharat Sevak, claiming to be an authorized Panorama Studios representative, arranged the deal and purportedly received ₹15.75 crore. Panorama Studios denies receipt of the funds and states Sevak’s authorization had expired before the transaction.
Legal Arguments and Court Ruling
Pathak’s legal team contended the dispute was commercial, not criminal, and highlighted his cooperation and pursuit of other remedies. The Delhi High Court rejected the plea, refusing to quash the FIR or stay proceedings.
Conclusion
The ruling reflects the judiciary’s approach to ensure fraud allegations in the entertainment industry are thoroughly investigated, balancing legal rights and investigative needs.
